As the dominant discourse would have it, the economic world is a pure and perfect order, implacably unrolling the logic of its predictable consequences, and prompt to repress all violations by the sanctions that it inflicts, either automatically or - more unusually - through the intermediary of its armed extensions, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the policies they impose: reducing labour costs, reducing public expenditures and making work more flexible. Is the dominant discourse right? What if, in reality, this economic order were no more than the implementation of a utopia - the utopia of neoliberalism - thus converted into a political problem? One that, with the aid of the economic theory that it proclaims, succeeds in conceiving of itself as the scientific description of reality?
This tutelary theory is a pure mathematical fiction. From the start it has been founded on a formidable abstraction. For, in the name of a narrow and strict conception of rationality as individual rationality, it brackets the economic and social conditions of rational orientations and the economic and social structures that are the condition of their application.
To give the measure of this omission, it is enough to think just of the educational system. Education is never taken account of as such at a time when it plays a determining role in the production of goods and services as in the production of the producers themselves. From this sort of original sin, inscribed in the Walrasian myth (1) of "pure theory", flow all of the deficiencies and faults of the discipline of economics and the fatal obstinacy with which it attaches itself to the arbitrary opposition which it induces, through its mere existence, between a properly economic logic, based on competition and efficiency, and social logic, which is subject to the rule of fairness.
That said, this "theory" that is desocialised and dehistoricised at its roots has, today more than ever, the means of making itself true and empirically verifiable. In effect, neoliberal discourse is not just one discourse among many. Rather, it is a "strong discourse" - the way psychiatric discourse is in an asylum, in Erving Goffman's analysis (2). It is so strong and so hard to combat only because it has on its side all of the forces of a world of relations of forces, a world that it contributes to making what it is. It does this most notably by orienting the economic choices of those who dominate economic relationships. It thus adds its own symbolic force to these relations of forces. In the name of this scientific programme, converted into a plan of political action, an immense political project
The essence of neoliberalism
文思屋
人氣:2.7W
最近更新
- 1For the League of Nations
- 2Civil engineers of the cover letter
- 3Discussion about the Mechanism of C
- 4The Name of a Poet
- 5The cost of marriage笑話
- 6The factory director of English resume
- 7One Side of the Case
- 8The Structure of an Interview
- 9Cover letter the Department of Medicine
- 10Profiles of the Chinese Pig Industry
- 11The Eight Types of Interview Questions
- 12Statement on the Articles of Impeachment
- 13Take Care of the Interviewers
- 14the important of a second language
- 15Impulsive Control of the Passive co
猜你喜歡
- 1Containerisation in the ports of Vietnam
- 2The Translation of English Idioms and Proverbs
- 3Great Depressions of the 20th Centu
- 4The Colors of the Rainbow考研英語作文
- 5The design of soft Van CV
- 6The Power of a Good Cover Letter
- 7The structure of Chinese Letter Writing
- 8Brainstorming as Part of the Negotiation
- 9Profiles of the Chinese Pig Industr
- 10The Design of USB Video Device
- 11Art Paper The Chain Of Art
- 12觀後感:Front of the Class
- 13The Seven Cs of Business Letter Writing
- 14Human resources director of the resume
- 15Biographical notes on the preservation of equipment