GRE考試中寫作佔了很大的分數，所以考生們要抓緊備考寫作。下面是小編為大家整理收集的GRE考試寫作高分技巧，僅供大家參考。
一、選用好的工具去準備複習
我們生活在一個有各種方便學習工具的年代，應該好好利用這些東西來準備GRE。在這裡我推薦以下幾種我用過的：
有道詞典 (這個APP可以裝在手機上，可以裝在電腦上，不管android/iOS還是windows/Mac都有版本，裡面最有用的是一個叫有道單詞本的東西，記過的單詞，可以儲存起來，隨時隨地都可以看，還可以自行customize測試題)
你的手機裡的各種GRE做題程式。尤其推薦iPad上一款叫GRE+, 由Arcadia Prep, Inc準備的數學題。非常好。
EverNote (一個我放在iPad上可以隨時記作文靈感的app，手機上也有，記錄了所有的作文題，沒事翻出來一個看看然後想points)
二、瀏覽有用的網站
推薦Magoosh () 網站。這個網站真的非常好。大家應該去看。比什麼Kaplan, Princeton Review來得好多，對GRE的分析很到位，很細膩。
三、看英文的一些新聞
比較簡單的英文文章可以在The Atlantic, Good Magazine, New York Times看到。還有比較晦澀難懂的，譬如Barnes & Noble Review。鑑於GRE經常時不時考一些book review的文章，看這個會有幫助。
四、如何去寫作文
1.首先是蒐集材料
寫GRE作文裡面有一個很有用的論證方法就是舉例論證。當然有很多更抽象的方法可以來證明我們的觀點。但是舉例論證無疑是最容易的。那麼例子從哪裡來呢?
GRE作文寫作高分技巧GRE作文寫作高分技巧與其去學習其他GRE作文的例子，不如自己蒐集例子，這樣可以避免抄襲。而且自己得來的資料自己也比較熟悉。不會說臨時忘記時間人物地點什麼的。
例子不宜多。太多記不住。每個分類的記錄幾個正的反的。
比如，關於政治家的ethic problem，可以用克林頓，或者尼克松來做例子。
每個分類都應該有自己的例子。政治有政治的例子。歷史有歷史的例子。教育有教育的例子。
如果能用時下最新新聞裡報道的一些事來做例子，那是再好不過。讓改卷人耳目一新，而不是一直看著那幾個翻來覆去反覆使用的舊故事。
2.分類準備points
這裡我強烈推薦大家去用《誰來拯救我的GRE ISSUE》一書。寄託裡有人分享下載。
當然，我沒有那麼多的時間，去整本看完。我主要是看它的分類。一共有五大分類：歷史文化傳播， 思想文化行為，成長學習教育，政治法律社會，科技生活時代。每個大分類之下，又把類似的文章分成幾個小類別。所以，只要這些小類別，你都去想想一些points，正反的觀點。然後看看你那幾個自己備用的例子能不能adapt上去，就相當於整個題目你已經提前審題好了。
3.學會列作文提綱
例題：關於政治家的道德， 有以下兩個小題目：
(一)To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. (Claim)
(二) To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. (Statement)
(三)參考提綱：
Introduction: I fundamentally agree that public officials must adhere to high ethical and moral standards which are beneficial to the their leadership as well as the society, although it is not their political duty to pursue the highest uprightness in morality.
t of all, public morality and successful leadership are for sure closely connected.
(1)Consider many leaders, such as Hitler, whom most people would agree were egregious violators of public morality -> such leaders forfeit their leadership as a result of the immoral means by which they obtained or wielded their power.
(2)Watergate scandal (a break-in into Democratic National Committee offices before American election and the subsequent attempts in cover-up by Nixon; Nixon administration's abuse of power toward the goal of undermining political opposition). President Nixon, whose contempt for the very legal system that afforded him his leadership led to his forfeiture of it.
leader has a social responsibility to be morally upright in order to set a good example for the society
(1)All the people who deal with him, whether those working under him or the common people , look up to him. He has responsibilities that he has to fulfill. Such an official needs to be exemplary by setting moral standards . This is because a good leader should act as a motivator and the best motivation to adhere to rules and regulations can be provided by a leader if he practices the regulations himself.
(2)Bill Clinton: Although he was involved in the Lewinsky Scandal , he was considered to be an effective leader. But immorality is very infectious and could creep into the system very quickly . Thus people who would not support my stand could have Mr. Clinton as an excuse for being effective without being a man of morals and integrity. If moral values are compromised by leaders or if they are found to be involved in scandals , their image is smeared in the eyes of the people . Their decisions are scrutinized and their motives will be doubted. This would lead to ineffective leadership. He could have been a more effective leader if he would not have been involved in such a scandal. He admitted his mistake and finally he ,too stuck to morality to salvage his lost pride .
ver, it is unrealistic to demand highest or complete pureness in politicians' morality.
(1)In Machiavellians' political thoughts, it is of most importance for politicians to maintain his power and orderliness of the state instead of pursuit of justice.
Politicians are ruling a world which is itself not morally good.
(2)Some prominent figures lie, not for self-serving reasons, but in attempt to secure what they saw as morally important political goals.
In those elections, you can't expect whatever the candidate says is true. They are using political tactics or tricks to convince the electorate to vote for them.
(3)As long as ... then it is okay.